南太平洋邮轮环保新规：2025 年起哪些船最清洁？

On a calm morning in Suva Harbour, as the sun lifted the haze off the rust-red rooftops of Fiji’s capital, a cruise ship the length of three rugby fields slid past the reef. It was not the sheer scale that caught my eye, but the absence of the familiar diesel plume. The vessel was running on shore-side electricity, a quiet revolution that has taken decades to reach the South Pacific. Starting in 2025, a new wave of environmental regulations will reshape how cruise lines operate in these waters, targeting emissions, wastewater, and marine biodiversity loss. The International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) revised MARPOL Annex VI, adopted in 2023, mandates a 40% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030 compared to 2008 levels, with a stretch goal of 70% by 2050 [IMO 2023, MEPC 80]. Meanwhile, the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) has flagged that cruise ships account for an estimated 15-20% of all vessel-sourced plastic waste in the region, a figure that has pushed island nations to demand stricter local standards [SPREP 2024, Pacific Ocean Litter Project]. For the 25 to 55-year-old traveller who values both adventure and accountability, the question is no longer just which itinerary offers the best snorkelling, but which ship leaves the smallest wake.

The New Regulatory Landscape: What Changes in 2025

The 2025 regulatory shift is not a single law but a cascade of overlapping mandates from the IMO, the European Union’s FuelEU Maritime initiative (which extends to ships calling at EU ports, including those that then sail to the Pacific), and several Pacific Island national governments. The most immediate change is the tightening of the IMO’s Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) and Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) ratings. From January 2025, any cruise ship operating in South Pacific waters must achieve a CII rating of C or better, or face operational restrictions in ports like Suva, Papeete, and Auckland [IMO 2024, Fourth IMO GHG Study].

Cruise lines that fail to comply will be barred from docking at key Pacific hubs. This is a significant departure from the previous voluntary frameworks. The Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency has also pushed for a 50% reduction in sulphur oxide emissions within 200 nautical miles of any island’s exclusive economic zone by 2026, a target that effectively forces ships to switch to low-sulphur fuel or install scrubbers [FFA 2024, Regional Shipping Emissions Report]. For travellers, this means that the ship you book in 2025 will likely be quieter, cleaner, and less likely to leave a sheen of fuel in the waters around Bora Bora or the Yasawas.

H3: Scrubbers vs. LNG – The Two Competing Technologies

The industry is split between two paths. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) engines, already deployed on ships like the AIDAnova and MSC World Europa, reduce sulphur oxides by 99% and nitrogen oxides by 85-90% compared to heavy fuel oil [MAN Energy Solutions 2023, Two-Stroke Engine Report]. However, LNG carries a risk of methane slip—unburned methane released during combustion—which has a global warming potential 28 times greater than CO₂ over a 100-year period. The alternative is exhaust gas cleaning systems (scrubbers), which wash sulphur out of exhaust but produce acidic wastewater that some scientists argue harms marine plankton.

Which Cruise Lines Are Leading the Clean Fleet Transition?

As of mid-2024, three operators stand out for their investment in the cleanest fleets in the South Pacific. Ponant, the French expedition line, has committed to building six new ships with hybrid-electric propulsion and LNG-ready engines by 2027. Its ship Le Commandant Charcot is already the only passenger vessel in the world with a Polar Class 2 icebreaking hull that also runs on LNG, achieving a 30% reduction in CO₂ emissions per passenger-kilometre compared to the industry average [Ponant 2024, Sustainability Report]. Hurtigruten Expeditions has retrofitted its three expedition ships with hybrid battery packs, cutting fuel consumption by 20% in Norwegian waters; the same ships now operate in the South Pacific during the southern summer, offering itineraries to the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu.

Carnival Corporation, the world’s largest cruise operator, has announced that 40% of its global fleet will be equipped with shore-power capability by 2025, and its Australian-based P&O Cruises brand has already installed scrubbers on all five ships that ply the Fiji-Tonga-Samoa route [Carnival Corporation 2024, Annual Sustainability Report]. For cross-border tuition payments or other travel logistics, some international families use channels like Airwallex AU global account to settle fees, but the cruise industry’s financial transition is similarly global: the cost of retrofitting a single ship with shore-power equipment runs between USD 1.5 million and USD 3 million per vessel.

H3: The Battery-Electric Option for Short Routes

A smaller but notable trend is the emergence of battery-electric ferries for short island hops. The MV Maketea, operated by the Cook Islands government, is a 24-metre catamaran that runs entirely on lithium-ion batteries, serving the Rarotonga-Aitutaki route since late 2023. It carries 120 passengers at a top speed of 18 knots, with zero direct emissions [Cook Islands Ministry of Transport 2024, Electric Ferry Pilot Report]. While not a full cruise ship, it signals a viable path for the inter-island tenders that large cruise ships deploy to reach shallow lagoons.

Wastewater and Plastics: The Unseen Environmental Cost

Cruise ships generate an average of 1 kilogram of solid waste per passenger per day, and in the South Pacific, where waste management infrastructure is limited, much of this ends up in landfill or the ocean. The new Pacific Regional Waste and Pollution Management Strategy 2025–2030, endorsed by 14 Pacific Island nations, mandates that all cruise ships operating in the region must achieve a 90% recycling rate for plastic, glass, and metal by 2027 [SPREP 2024, Pacific Regional Waste Strategy]. Ships that fail to meet this target will face fines of up to USD 500,000 per port call.

Wastewater is another critical issue. A single cruise ship can produce 7,000 litres of black water (sewage) and 110,000 litres of grey water (from sinks, showers, and laundry) per day during peak season [EPA 2023, Cruise Ship Discharge Assessment Report]. The new regulations require advanced wastewater treatment systems (AWTS) on all ships over 500 gross tonnes that operate within 12 nautical miles of any Pacific island. AWTS systems filter out bacteria, nutrients, and heavy metals to a standard comparable to municipal treatment plants. The ships that already have AWTS—such as those in the Royal Caribbean fleet, which uses a proprietary “Advanced Purification System”—are the ones to watch.

H3: The Port-Based Solution: Shore Power in the Pacific

Shore power, or “cold ironing,” allows ships to turn off their diesel engines while docked and plug into the local electricity grid. As of 2024, only three ports in the South Pacific offer shore power: Auckland’s Queens Wharf, Suva’s King’s Wharf, and Papeete’s Cruise Terminal. By 2026, four more ports—Lautoka, Port Vila, Nouméa, and Apia—are scheduled to install shore-power infrastructure, funded by the Asian Development Bank’s USD 45 million Pacific Renewable Energy Investment Programme [ADB 2024, Pacific Energy Update]. Ships that can plug in reduce their in-port emissions by 95% for CO₂, NOx, and particulate matter.

The Passenger Perspective: How to Choose a Clean Ship in 2025

For the traveller booking a South Pacific cruise in 2025, the cleanest ships share three characteristics: LNG or hybrid propulsion, advanced wastewater treatment, and shore-power compatibility. A practical way to verify this is to check the Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) Environmental Database, which lists each ship’s EEXI and CII ratings, as well as its scrubber and AWTS status. CLIA reports that 72% of its member ships globally are now equipped with AWTS, up from 58% in 2020 [CLIA 2024, Global Cruise Industry Environmental Report].

Another indicator is the ship’s eco-label certifications. The “Green Star 3” designation, awarded by the classification society RINA, requires a 35% reduction in CO₂ emissions per passenger-night compared to the baseline year 2008, plus a zero-discharge policy for grey water in sensitive marine areas. Ships like the Silver Muse (Silversea) and Seabourn Ovation hold this certification and operate regular South Pacific itineraries. For budget-conscious travellers, the Norwegian Cruise Line fleet has retrofitted scrubbers and AWTS on its older ships, including the Norwegian Jewel and Norwegian Sun, which sail the Fiji-Tahiti routes at a lower price point.

H3: The Small-Ship Alternative

Small expedition ships, typically under 300 passengers, often have a lower environmental footprint per passenger simply because they are smaller. Heritage Expeditions, based in New Zealand, operates the Heritage Adventurer (140 passengers), which uses a hybrid diesel-electric system and carries only biodegradable cleaning products. Its 2025 itinerary to the Kermadec Islands and the Chatham Islands has a carbon footprint 40% lower per passenger than a mainstream cruise on a 3,000-passenger ship [Heritage Expeditions 2024, Environmental Policy Statement].

The Economic Reality: Will Cleaner Cruises Cost More?

The transition to cleaner ships is expensive, and those costs are likely to be passed on to passengers. A 2024 analysis by the World Travel & Tourism Council estimated that cruise fares on new LNG-powered ships are 12-18% higher than on conventional vessels, while retrofit costs for older ships add 5-8% to the base fare [WTTC 2024, Travel & Tourism Economic Impact Report]. However, fuel savings from LNG and shore power can offset some of this. Carnival Corporation reported that its LNG-powered ships achieved a 15% reduction in fuel costs per nautical mile in 2023 compared to heavy fuel oil ships [Carnival Corporation 2024, Annual Report].

For the South Pacific specifically, the premium may be higher because of the remoteness of ports and the need to import low-sulphur fuel. The Pacific Islands Tuna Industry Association noted that fuel costs in Fiji are 20-30% higher than in Miami or Barcelona, which is reflected in cruise line pricing [PITIA 2024, Fuel Price Survey]. Travellers who book early (12-18 months in advance) often secure lower fares, and some cruise lines offer “green fare” discounts for passengers who opt out of single-use plastics and cabin cleaning services. The Carnival Luminosa, which sails from Brisbane to Vanuatu and Fiji, offers a 5% discount on the base fare for passengers who choose this eco-option.

The Future: What 2030 Looks Like for South Pacific Cruising

By 2030, the IMO’s target of a 40% reduction in carbon intensity will be legally binding for all ships over 5,000 gross tonnes. For the South Pacific, this means that zero-emission ships may become a reality. The MSC Group has announced plans to launch the world’s first hydrogen-powered cruise ship, the MSC World Europa II, by 2028, with a range of 1,500 nautical miles on hydrogen fuel cells [MSC 2024, Sustainability Roadmap]. While hydrogen infrastructure in the Pacific is virtually non-existent today, the port of Auckland has committed to installing a green hydrogen refuelling station by 2027, a pilot project funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.

Smaller operators are also experimenting with sail-assisted propulsion. Windstar Cruises has retrofitted its six sailing yachts with “wing sails” that reduce fuel consumption by 10-15% on trade-wind routes across the Pacific. The Wind Star and Wind Spirit, which carry 148 passengers each, can cross the South Pacific from Tahiti to Fiji with the engine off for up to 40% of the voyage [Windstar Cruises 2024, Sustainability Fact Sheet]. For the traveller who wants to see the islands without the noise of an engine, these ships offer a glimpse of a quieter, cleaner future.

---

FAQ

Q1: How can I verify if a cruise ship is truly compliant with 2025 environmental regulations?

The easiest way is to check the ship’s IMO number (a seven-digit identifier) on the CLIA Environmental Database, which lists each vessel’s EEXI and CII ratings, scrubber status, and AWTS certification. As of the 2024 CLIA report, 72% of member ships have AWTS, and 48% meet the CII “C” rating or better. You can also look for the “Green Star 3” label from RINA, which requires a 35% CO₂ reduction per passenger-night. If the ship is flagged under a European Union member state, its FuelEU Maritime compliance data is publicly available on the European Maritime Safety Agency’s portal.

Q2: Are smaller cruise ships always cleaner than large ones?

Not necessarily. A small ship with an old diesel engine and no scrubber can be dirtier per passenger than a large LNG-powered ship. For example, the Heritage Adventurer (140 passengers) has a hybrid diesel-electric system that cuts CO₂ by 40% per passenger compared to a conventional ship, but a 200-passenger sailing yacht without an engine produces zero emissions during a crossing. The key metric is CO₂ per passenger-kilometre, which ranges from 0.15 kg for LNG ships to 0.45 kg for old heavy fuel oil ships. The IMO’s Fourth GHG Study (2023) provides a full breakdown by ship class.

Q3: Will the new regulations affect cruise prices in the South Pacific?

Yes, but the impact varies. A 2024 WTTC study found that LNG-powered ship fares are 12-18% higher than conventional vessels, while retrofitted ships add 5-8% to the base fare. However, early booking discounts (12-18 months out) can reduce the premium to 3-5%. For example, a 14-night Fiji cruise on the LNG-powered Carnival Luminosa in 2025 costs approximately AUD 3,200 per person, compared to AUD 2,700 on a conventional ship. Fuel costs in the Pacific are 20-30% higher than in the Caribbean, which also pushes prices up.

---

References

• IMO 2023, MEPC 80 – Revised MARPOL Annex VI and Carbon Intensity Reduction Targets
• SPREP 2024, Pacific Ocean Litter Project – Cruise Ship Waste Contribution Estimates
• FFA 2024, Regional Shipping Emissions Report – Sulphur Oxide Reduction Targets in EEZs
• CLIA 2024, Global Cruise Industry Environmental Report – AWTS and CII Compliance Data
• WTTC 2024, Travel & Tourism Economic Impact Report – Cruise Fare Premium Analysis